Regfo
Module 3qualitydrug-productndaind● High priority

3.2.P.3.3 — Manufacturing Process and Controls

Flow diagram and narrative of drug product manufacturing process with critical steps

Requirements by Phase

Phase 1
minimal
Phase 2
minimal
Phase 3
expanded
NDA
full

Flow diagram and narrative of drug product manufacturing process with critical steps

Requirements by Phase

IND Phase 1: minimal IND Phase 2: minimal IND Phase 3: expanded NDA: full

Content (NCE/Small Molecule)

  • Flow diagram of the manufacturing process showing critical steps and process controls
  • Narrative description of each manufacturing step including packaging
  • Scale of manufacture
  • Equipment identification
  • Process parameters (time, temperature, pH, speeds)
  • Novel processes described in detail

Content (Biotech)

  • Flow diagram of manufacturing process
  • Narrative description with scale, buffers, reagents, equipment
  • Critical steps and controls identified
  • Aseptic processing details

Expected Deliverables

  • Manufacturing process flow diagram
  • Manufacturing narrative document
  • Process parameters table
  • In-process controls table

ICH Guidelines: Q6B, Q7

Regulatory Requirements (FDA IND PHASE 1)

  • [Phase 1] A brief description of the manufacturing process, including a list of the reagents, solvents, and catalysts used, should be submitted.
  • [Phase 1] A diagrammatic presentation and a brief written description of the manufacturing process should be submitted, including sterilization process for sterile products.

Regulatory Requirements (FDA IND PHASE 2 3 CMC)

  • [All] Certain information traditionally submitted in information amendments, identified as corroborating information, can be submitted in an annual report.
  • [Phase 2] Limited phase 2 corroborating information recommended in section III need not be submitted before initiation of phase 2 studies and can be generated during phase 2 drug development.
  • [Phase 3] Phase 3 corroborating information recommended in section IV need not be submitted before the initiation of phase 3 studies and can be generated during phase 3 drug development.
  • [All] Corroborating information and a summary of CMC safety information submitted during a subject-reporting period should be included in the annual report, eliminating the need for general CMC updates at the end of phase 1 or phase 2.
  • [All] CMC safety information should be submitted to support the safe use of the drug.
  • [Phase 2] The CMC safety information identified in section III (Phase 2 Studies) should be submitted before initiation of the phase 2 studies.
  • [Phase 3] The CMC safety information identified in section IV (Phase 3 Studies) should be submitted before initiation of the phase 3 studies.
  • [All] When new information becomes available that relates to the safe use of the drug or when there are changes in previously submitted CMC safety information, it should be submitted during IND clinical trials in an information amendment.
  • [All] For changes with a significant potential to affect the safety of the product, an information amendment should be submitted describing the changes and containing relevant information at a level of detail sufficient for an adequate review and assessment.
  • [Phase 2] Corroborating information specified in section III (Phase 2 Studies) that is generated during phase 1 need not be submitted until the first annual report after initiation of phase 2 studies.
  • [Phase 2] Corroborating information specified in section III (Phase 2 Studies) that is generated during phase 2 studies should be submitted in the next annual report after the information becomes available.
  • [Phase 3] Corroborating information specified in section IV (Phase 3 Studies) that is generated earlier during phase 1 and phase 2 need not be submitted until the first annual report after initiation of phase 3 studies.
  • [Phase 3] Corroborating information specified in section IV (Phase 3 Studies) that is generated during phase 3 studies should be submitted in the next annual report after the information becomes available.
  • [Phase 2] Updates on the brief description of the drug substance and a more detailed description of the configuration and chemical structure for complex organic compounds should be provided.
  • [Phase 2] The addition, deletion, or change of any manufacturer of the drug substance from that specified during phase 1 should be reported.

Regulatory Requirements (ICH Q1AR2)

  • [Pre-approval] The manufacturing process used for primary batches of drug product should simulate that to be applied to production batches and should provide product of the same quality and meeting the same specification as that intended for marketing.

Regulatory Requirements (ICH Q3AR2)

  • [Registration] For each batch, the report should include batch identity/size, date/site of manufacture, manufacturing process, individual/total impurity content, use of batches, and reference to analytical procedure.
  • [Commercial] Acceptance criteria should be set no higher than the level that can be justified by safety data, and should be consistent with the level achievable by the manufacturing process and the analytical capability.

Regulatory Requirements (ICH Q6A)

  • [Marketing Approval] Inorganic impurities: The need for tests and acceptance criteria for inorganic impurities (e.g., catalysts) should be studied based on manufacturing process knowledge, following pharmacopoeial precedents for sulfated ash/residue on ignition.
  • [Marketing Approval] Microbial limits: Microbial limit testing is generally advisable for drug products unless components are tested and the manufacturing process is validated not to carry a significant risk of contamination or proliferation.
  • [Marketing Approval] Microbial limits: Microbial limit testing is generally advisable for drug products unless components are tested and the manufacturing process is validated not to carry a significant risk of contamination or proliferation.

Regulatory Requirements (ICH Q6B)

  • [Manufacturing] When a correlation exists between quantity and biological assay values, it may be appropriate to use measurement of quantity rather than the measurement of biological activity in manufacturing processes, such as filling.
  • [Development, Validation] Data obtained during development and validation runs should provide the basis for provisional action limits to be set for the manufacturing process.
  • [Manufacturing] Process-related impurities in the drug substance should be minimized by the use of appropriate well-controlled manufacturing processes.

Source: 21 CFR 211; ICH Q8(R2)

Check your compliance against this section

Upload your study data and get instant gap analysis with specific regulatory citations.

Try Compliance Check