Regfo
Module 4-nonclinicalnonclinicaltoxicologyndaind

4.2.3.3 — Genotoxicity

Genotoxicity studies: in vitro (Ames, chromosomal aberration) and in vivo (micronucleus)

Requirements by Phase

Phase 1
required
Phase 2
required
Phase 3
required
NDA
required

Genotoxicity studies: in vitro (Ames, chromosomal aberration) and in vivo (micronucleus)

Requirements by Phase

IND Phase 1: required IND Phase 2: required IND Phase 3: required NDA: required

Regulatory Requirements (ICH S2R1)

  • [Preclinical (before marketing authorization)] Completion of either standard test battery option (negative results, appropriate protocols, adequate evaluation) provides sufficient assurance of absence of genotoxic activity, and no additional tests are warranted.
  • [Preclinical] In vivo genotoxicity endpoints should be incorporated into toxicity studies for repeated administrations, if scientifically justified.
  • [Preclinical] A single bacterial mutation (Ames) test is considered sufficient if it is clearly negative or positive, and carried out with a fully adequate protocol.
  • [Preclinical] For in vitro cytogenetic assays (metaphase chromosome aberrations or micronuclei), cytotoxicity should not exceed a reduction of about 50% in cell growth.
  • [Preclinical] For the Mouse Lymphoma L5178Y Cell Tk Gene Mutation Assay (MLA), at the top dose there should be 80-90% cytotoxicity as measured by an RTG between 20-10%.
  • [Preclinical] Small increases in apparent genotoxicity (statistically significant but within historical control confidence intervals, or weak/equivocal and not reproducible) are not considered biologically meaningful, and no further testing is called for.
  • [Preclinical] Positive results in the Ames test are thought to indicate DNA reactivity, and extensive follow-up testing to assess in vivo mutagenic and carcinogenic potential would be warranted.
  • [Preclinical] If in vitro mammalian cell positive results occur only under conditions not occurring in vivo (pH, osmolality, precipitates) or only at the most toxic concentrations (≥80% RTG for MLA, ≥50% growth suppression for cytogenetics), a single in vivo test is considered sufficient.
  • [Preclinical] Negative results in appropriate in vivo assays (two, with adequate justification for the endpoints measured and demonstration of exposure) are considered sufficient to demonstrate absence of significant genotoxic risk.
  • [Preclinical] For in vivo studies, it is considered sufficient to treat animals with a positive control only periodically, and not concurrently with every assay, after a laboratory has established competence in the use of the assay.

Source: ICH S2(R1)

Cross-References: Positive results may require follow-up with Carcinogenicity studies. Summarized in the Toxicology Written Summary.

References

Check your compliance against this section

Upload your study data and get instant gap analysis with specific regulatory citations.

Try Compliance Check